Having Solved That Pesky Terrorism Problem, Feds Concentrate on Arresting Jenna Jameson

I got three words for ya, baby: War On Porn.

And all I've got to say to that is: It's about time!

I was just thinking about how the U.S. just isn't stretching itself like it used to. Frankly, I'm tired of hearing "terror this" and "terror that"! I want something new to be frightened of... and by gosh if a Bush appointee (certainly, a qualified one) didn't find something for me: Consenting adults having sex. Ahh, porn... you thought we forgot about ye?

Here's the first sentence that I like in the article:

The new squad will divert eight agents, a supervisor and assorted support staff to gather evidence against "manufacturers and purveyors" of pornography -- not the kind exploiting children, but the kind that depicts, and is marketed to, consenting adults.

That is so cool. The Feds aren't out to protect the children, but they're going to protect adults from themselves! That's what I call small government. Not surprisingly, some commie liberal doesn't agree:

"I guess this means we've won the war on terror," said one exasperated FBI agent, speaking on the condition of anonymity because poking fun at headquarters is not regarded as career-enhancing. "We must not need any more resources for espionage."

It goes without saying that this is either a made-up quote, or something a disgruntled employee said. I mean, why else would this guy speak under anonymity? What does he have to hide? He probably watches a ton of porn. The pervert!

Plus:

But Gonzales endorses the rationale ... that adult pornography is a threat to families and children. Christian conservatives, long skeptical of Gonzales, greeted the pornography initiative with what the Family Research Council called "a growing sense of confidence in our new attorney general."

Yes, absolutely. Mr. Gonzales has hit the head on the nail once again. Like that time he wrote the memo that approved of US sanctioned torture, once more he is the voice of reason. Porno is so detrimental to the family, that tax payer funds absolutely must be diverted from, say, helping the poor for example, to battle this dastardly foe. I mean why spend money on poor minorities when it can be better used to battle a mostly white porn-endemic. Makes total sense to me. It'll be a "trickle-down" effect. First, whitey stops watching porn. Then whitey will have better, government-enforced morals. Then, society as a whole will be helped (even SAVED!!!) and everyone will benefit.

Let's face it, to move 10 officers from the child porn division to the adult porn division is a good move no matter how you look at it. God bless America for so wisely spending my tax dollars (well, not MY tax dollars... at this point, we're probably spending my great grandkids' tax dollars... but whatever).